Within eLearning, I believe that there are certain tasks that will not
be accessible to the generalist user - primarily graphic arts work.
However, the tools available are now enabling the Subject Matter Expert
to be able to do something they previously could not: create coherent,
well implemented, multi-page content. The standards (SCORM/AICC) aren't
changing how development is being done - but they do help make it
possible to track more, different content using a variety of LMSs.
(These standards are relatively young.)
A good approach is to give tools to the SME/Instructional Designer so
that they can input, maintain, and update the textual content of the
courses. Good tools also allow them to manage additional
graphics/multimedia created by specialists in those areas, without
burdening the SME/ID with graphic work. There are still many tools
(advertized as "easy to use") out there that are only accessible to a
graphic designer in order to do the textual content. This is a problem
because graphic designers with instructional design and subject matter
expertise are hard to find.
The real value for the standards are, and will be:
1. Interoperability of content (communication for tracking)
2. (Currently becoming available:) Communication to allow more dynamic
content (a database-driven server-based system can alter paths of
3. (Future:) Interesting ways to combine content and provide more data